McqkartGet appPractise

All the objects of human reason or enquiry may naturally be divided into two kinds, namely relations of ideas and matters of fact. Of the first kind are the sciences of Geometry, Algebra and Arithmetic, and in short every affirmation which is either intuitively or demonstratively certain. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the two sides expresses a relation between these figures. That three times five is equal to the half of thirty expresses a relation between these numbers.

Propositions of this kind are discoverable by the mere operation of thought, without dependence on what is anywhere existent in the universe. Though there never was a circle or triangle in nature, the truths demonstrated by Euclid would forever retain their certainty and evidence.

Matters of fact, which are the second objects of human reason, are not ascertained in the same manner, nor is our evidence of their truth, however great, of a like nature with the foregoing. The contrary of every matter of fact is still possible, because it can never imply a contradiction and is conceived by the mind with the same facility and distinctness as if ever so conformable to reality. That the sun will not rise tomorrow is no less intelligible a proposition, and implies no more contradiction, than the affirmation that it will rise. We should in vain, therefore, attempt to demonstrate its falsehood.

As per the perspective of the passage, the nature of reasoning concerning matters of fact is based on:

ABoth perception and inference
BInference only
CPerception only
DRelation of cause and effect only
🔒 Answer hidden — practise on Mcqkart to check yourself and see the explanation.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.

Practise on Mcqkart →🎓 Book an expert →