McqkartGet appPractise

Earlier this week, European Union lawmakers laid the groundwork for the rollout of its proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism from 2026. Essentially a carbon border tax, it is shrouded in green principles of pricing carbon, reducing emissions and preventing carbon leakage to combat global warming. But in reality it is nothing but a tax against emerging economies like India exporting to the EU.

True, the European bloc has ambitious climate targets of cutting greenhouse gases by 55% over this decade and seeks to withdraw free carbon allowances for its most polluting industries. However, by targeting imports of carbon-intensive goods such as aluminium, steel, cement, fertilisers and electricity, it is imposing European emission standards on emerging economies. This is a clear violation of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities of international climate action.

The rich countries of the global north bear historic responsibility for global warming. But after having achieved a high standard of living through centuries of polluting industries, they now want to slam the development door shut on the rest of the world. Further exemplifying this hypocrisy is the fact that when the Ukraine war pushed up energy prices last year, EU nations had no qualms falling back on dirty coal.

Plus, rich nations have done little to mobilise the targeted 100 billion dollars for climate funding to help developing nations transition to low-carbon pathways. Thus, India is right to object to the EU carbon tax. It should prepare retaliatory measures, including taking the matter to the World Trade Organization and flagging it as a non-tariff barrier.

Given below are two statements. In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below.

Statement I:The European bloc seeks to impose European emission standards on emerging economies.
Statement II:Rich nations are helping the developing nations transition to low-carbon pathways through climate funding.
ABoth Statement I and Statement II are true
BBoth Statement I and Statement II are false
CStatement I is true but Statement II is false ✓ Correct
DStatement I is false but Statement II is true
Correct answer: (C) Statement I is true but Statement II is false
Explanation

Statement I is true and Statement II is false, so the answer is Statement I is true but Statement II is false.

The passage says the EU is imposing European emission standards on emerging economies through the tax.

So statement I matches the passage and is true.

The passage says rich nations have done little to mobilise the targeted 100 billion dollars in climate funding.

So they are not really helping developing nations transition to low-carbon pathways.

Therefore statement II contradicts the passage and is false.

The text frames the funding failure as part of the wealthy nations' hypocrisy.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.

Practise on Mcqkart →🎓 Book an expert →