McqkartGet appPractise

Aware of the high stakes involved in seizing control over the Indus for navigation, the British persuaded two Sindh amirs, Rustam Khan, the Amir of Khanpur, and Murad Ali of Hyderabad, to enter into a one-sided treaty and act as proxies to throw the Indus open to British military and political penetration. Under the treaty, signed reluctantly by the Sindh amirs, the British obtained the right to take the final decision regarding taxation duties on goods passing through the Indus to the Arabian Sea.

This was a variation of gunboat diplomacy with which the advancing British seized the veto in their hands to control the entire trade flow from Central Asia to Sindh, and thereby the right to manipulate the economies of the regions and the states, including that of Ranjit Singh, whose removal was not on their agenda. The next step was to coerce Ranjit Singh to sign the treaty, opening the Sutlej to commerce as well.

The British agent, Captain Wade, told the Maharaja that the expansion of trade in his dominions would result only after signing the treaty. But the British agencies had disrupted the economy of the Sikh state by imposing a heavy toll of Rs. 570 on the boats carrying large loads.

This included the pashmina shawl output from 20,000 looms that were operating in Kashmir. The shawls were exported mainly to the European market, especially France, where they posed stiff competition to woollen manufacturers from Britain.

Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below.

Assertion (A):The British wanted Ranjit Singh to sign the treaty.
Reason (R):The British wanted to control the trade through the Indus.
ABoth A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
BBoth A and R are correct but R is not the correct explanation of A ✓ Correct
CA is correct but R is not correct
DA is not correct but R is correct
Correct answer: (B) Both A and R are correct but R is not the correct explanation of A
Explanation

Both are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion, so that is the answer.

The British wanted Ranjit Singh to sign the treaty, so the assertion is true.

The purpose behind pressing him was to open the Sutlej to commerce.

The British did want to control the trade through the Indus, so the reason is true.

But the treaty with Ranjit Singh concerned the Sutlej, not the Indus.

So the Indus reason does not directly explain wanting his signature.

Therefore both are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.

Practise on Mcqkart →🎓 Book an expert →