Match the List I (Legal) with List II (Judgement Ruling).

List I

i.Rameshwar Vs. State of Rajasthan 1952

ii.Rafiq Vs. State of UP, 1980

iii.Harpal Singh and another Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh, 1981

iv.Bharwada Bhogibhai Hirjibhai Vs. State of Gujarat, 1983

List II

a.Supreme Court held that the testimony of the rape victim should not be rejected unless there are very strong evidences mitigating its veracity

b.Supreme Court held that corroborative evidence of the woman's testimony is not necessary

c.Supreme Court held that in case of rape the necessity of corroboration was to be treated only as a 'rule of prudence'

d.Supreme Court held that a woman is used to sexual intercourse is immaterial in a rape trial

Ai-d, ii-a, iii-b, iv-c

Bi-a, ii-b, iii-c, iv-d

Ci-b, ii-d, iii-a, iv-c

Di-c, ii-a, iii-d, iv-b

🔒 Answer hidden — practise on Mcqkart to check yourself and see the explanation.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.