McqkartGet appPractise

It being an established fact that the object and the subject, that are fit to be the contents of the concepts 'you' and 'we', and are by nature as contradictory as light and darkness, cannot logically have any identity, it follows that their attribution can have it still less.

Accordingly the superimposition of the object, referable through the concept 'you', and its attributes on the subject that is conscious by nature and is referable through the concept 'we', and contrariwise the superimposition of the subject and its attributes on the object, should be impossible.

This passage is drawn from Adi Sankaracarya's Brahmasutrabhasya.

The superimposition of the 'Object' on to the 'Subject' and vice versa is:

ALogically possible but ontologically impossible
BLogically and ontologically possible
CLogically impossible but ontologically possible
DLogically as well as ontologically impossible
🔒 Answer hidden — practise on Mcqkart to check yourself and see the explanation.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.

Practise on Mcqkart →🎓 Book an expert →