Political Science · Western Political Thought
Which is Not one of the interpretations of why Machiavelli wrote The Prince?
ATo bring out the difference between how things are and how they ought to be
BThe Prince does not reflect his true thoughts but is a satire warning people how bad a single ruler can be
CIt shows the confusion and contradiction in his thought between monarchy and republicanism ✓ Correct
DIt denotes his proto-modernist thought, such as nationalism and secularism
Correct answer: (C) It shows the confusion and contradiction in his thought between monarchy and republicanism — The interpretation about confusion and contradiction is not a valid reading.
Explanation
★The interpretation about confusion and contradiction is not a valid reading.
★Machiavelli clearly showed his inclination for a republican form of government.
★So there was no real confusion between monarchy and republicanism.
★He did bring out the difference between how things are and how they ought to be.
★Some read The Prince as a satire warning against a single ruler.
★It also reflects his proto-modern ideas of nationalism and secularism.
★So the confusion-and-contradiction reading is the odd one out.
Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.
Shared by Mcqkart · via Mcqkart.in