Mcqkart
Mcqkart
Practice Log in

Which one of the following pairs is not correctly matched?

Political Science · Political Institutions in India UGC NET July 2016 Political Science
Which one of the following pairs is not correctly matched?
ALaxmi Kant Pandey vs Union of India : inter-country adoption of Indian babies
BSP Gupta vs President of India and others : enabling citizens to file public interest litigation for social cause
CMohini Jain vs State of Karnataka : enjoyment of pollution-free water and air ✓ Correct
DOlga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation : right to livelihood
Correct answer: (C) Mohini Jain vs State of Karnataka : enjoyment of pollution-free water and air — The pair of Mohini Jain with the right to pollution-free water and air is not correctly matched, so it is the answer.
Explanation
The pair of Mohini Jain with the right to pollution-free water and air is not correctly matched, so it is the answer.
Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka actually established that the right to education flows from the right to life under Article 21.
The case struck down the high capitation fees charged by private medical colleges from students outside the government seat quota.
Laxmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India correctly relates to the regulation of inter-country adoption of Indian children.
SP Gupta v. Union of India correctly relates to the expansion of public interest litigation and the locus standi rule.
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation correctly relates to the right to livelihood as part of the right to life.
For NET, fix Mohini Jain with the right to education and Unni Krishnan as its later refinement.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.

Shared by Mcqkart · via Mcqkart.in

Discover more from Mcqkart

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.