Paper 1 · Comprehension
UGC NET December 2021 June 2022 (14.10.2022) Shift-II
Passage
Gandhi's speech in Banaras in February 1916 was, at one level, merely a statement of fact, namely that Indian nationalism was an elite phenomenon, a creation of lawyers and doctors and landlords. But at another level it was a statement of intent, the first public announcement of the returning expatriate's own desire to make Indian nationalism more properly representative of the Indian people. In the last month of that year, Gandhi was presented with an opportunity to put his precepts into practice. At a meeting held in Lucknow in December 1916, he was approached by a peasant from Champaran in Bihar, who told him about the harsh treatment of peasants by British indigo planters. Gandhi spent most of 1917 in Champaran, seeking to obtain for the peasants security of tenure as well as the freedom to cultivate the crops of their choice. In 1918 Gandhi was involved in two campaigns in his home state of Gujarat: first he intervened in a labour dispute in Ahmedabad to better the conditions of textile mill workers, and then he joined peasants in Kheda seeking remission of taxes after the failure of their harvest. These initiatives marked Gandhi as a nationalist with sympathy for the poor, though they were local struggles. During the First World War the British had instituted press censorship and permitted detention without trial, and the Rowlatt committee recommended the continuation of these tough measures. Gandhi's call for a countrywide campaign against them brought life to a standstill in north and west India.
According to the passage, which was the statement of fact in Mahatma Gandhi's speech at Banaras?
ALawyers, doctors and landlords sided with the British
BIndian nationalism was elitist ✓ Correct
CNationalism was of another level in India
DThe existing Indian nationalism was highly effective
Correct answer: (B) Indian nationalism was elitist — The answer is that Indian nationalism was elitist.
Explanation
★The answer is that Indian nationalism was elitist.
★The speech noted as a fact that Indian nationalism was an elite phenomenon.
★It was described as a creation of lawyers, doctors and landlords.
★So the statement of fact was that Indian nationalism was elitist.
★It did not say these groups sided with the British.
★Nor did it claim the existing nationalism was highly effective.
★So the answer is that Indian nationalism was elitist.
Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.
Shared by Mcqkart · via Mcqkart.in
