McqkartGet appPractise

Project Tiger turned 50 years recently. An often repeated headline was how the numbers have increased from 2,967 individuals in 2018 to 3,167 in 2022. This hides the bitter truth : Indians aren't going to compromise Western lifestyles for the survival of the Tiger. Most middle class Indians would loathe to give up their second, investment home or driving to the hills on a multilane highway for the national animal. You also can't change the needs of a tiger - it is a large, solitary animal.

A female tiger needs about 15 square kilometres with a good prey base. If she reproduces, those cubs will require additional space. Data shows 30% of the tigers live outside protected areas, i.e in our midst. The more we fragment their habitat with urbanization, highways and industrial parks, the more they will be forced into unprotected areas. Let's modify our approach.

I advocate of three results by the 75th anniversary of project Tiger. First, instead of endlessly increasing tiger population, India can identify and achieve a metric, not much higher than the current numbers. Remember, 1000 tigers already roam around in farms and villages, more will be a disaster. Second, let's better protect what we have. Keeping protected tiger habitat undisturbed is key. Investment in keeping unprotected ecosystems intact should be financially viable and part of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and more.

Third, reducing confrontation viable and part of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and more. Third, reducing confrontation with humans is essential. Monitoring and communications technology are key to this. Compensation for live stock killed must be rapidly assessed and pegged to market rates. For the next quarter century, let's think quality.

According to the writer, the 75th anniversary of Project Tiger should NOT aim at which of the following? Choose the correct answer from the options given below.

1.Keep the protected habitats intact
2.Keep the tiger population about the same as at present
3.Livestock killed by tigers should be adequately compensated for
4.Focus on quantity instead of quality
A1 and 2 only
B2, 3 and 4 only
C3 and 4 only
D4 only ✓ Correct
Correct answer: (D) 4 only
Explanation

The anniversary should not aim at focusing on quantity instead of quality, so the answer is 4 only.

The writer ends by urging that the next quarter century think quality.

So focusing on quantity instead of quality is exactly what he warns against.

Keeping protected habitats intact is something he recommends.

Keeping the population about the same and compensating for livestock are also his suggestions.

So only the fourth aim is one the writer opposes.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.

Practise on Mcqkart →🎓 Book an expert →