"Dogs are frequently encountered in the streets. Siberian huskies are dogs. Therefore Siberian huskies are frequently encountered in the streets." This arguments is invalid because it commits the fallacy of :

The argument commits the fallacy of division.

It takes a feature true of the class of dogs taken generally and transfers it to a particular subgroup, the huskies.

Being frequently encountered in the streets describes dogs as a whole, not necessarily any single breed.

Reasoning from a property of the whole or collective down to its members is the fallacy of division.

The error is the reverse of composition, moving from whole to part.