Given below are two statements. In the light of the above statements, choose the correct answer from the options given below.

Statement I:In the classical Indian school, induction affirms the major premise because universality cannot be perceived.

Statement II:Classical Indian logicians give a separate treatment of the inductive method.

ABoth Statement I and Statement II are true

BBoth Statement I and Statement II are false ✓ Correct

CStatement I is true but Statement II is false

DStatement I is false but Statement II is true

Correct answer: (B) Both Statement I and Statement II are false

Explanation

Both claims misdescribe classical Indian logic, so each is false.

Indian logicians do not split reasoning into a separate deductive and a separate inductive process.

Establishing the universal relation and applying it form one continuous act of inference.

For the same reason they offer no isolated, self-standing treatment of induction.

Treating induction as a detached method contradicts this blended character of their logic.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.