McqkartGet appPractise

India needs to manage daylight much better than it does. Maximising it is also a good place to start to be more energy efficient. Not using daylight properly comes at a cost of 4.1 billion dollars, or 0.2% of GDP, according to a Cornell study, in addition to health impacts. Experts have suggested multiple time zones in India, perhaps reverting to the pre-1947 system of two time zones, as proposed by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) National Physical Laboratory, India's official time keeper.

But considering the huge investments required, as well as the logistical exercise of coordination, this idea is unattractive, and daylight saving is a more practical option. Daylight saving time, or summertime, is the system of advancing the clock by an hour to get more light out of the day. This would permit using the extra hour of daylight in the summer months between March and October, and it would avoid using light on winter mornings because the sun rises later.

This system will be particularly useful in the eastern and northeastern parts of the country. To further maximise use of daylight, a shift away from uniform opening hours at workplaces can be advantageous. The sun sets roughly 90 minutes later in western parts of the country than in the eastern parts.

In northeastern and eastern states, establishments could begin work an hour earlier than elsewhere. It would allow people here to match their working hours to environmental cues, while giving a head start to others elsewhere. Advancing time to maximise use of daylight has energy-saving potential, which will significantly alter energy usage, cut down India's carbon footprint and help leverage the natural resource of sunlight. It is about maximising the day when the sun shines.

Having multiple time zones or two time zones is not a practical option because

1.It cannot be done
2.The costs involved are huge
3.It will serve no purpose
4.The logistical exercise of coordination will be needed
A1, 2 & 3 only
B1, 2 & 4 only
C3 & 4 only
D2 & 4 only ✓ Correct
Correct answer: (D) 2 & 4 only
Explanation

The reasons are the huge cost and the logistical coordination, so the answer is 2 and 4.

The passage says multiple time zones would need huge investments, matching item 2.

It also cites the logistical exercise of coordination as a difficulty, matching item 4.

Together these make the idea unattractive and impractical.

The passage does not say it cannot be done at all, so item 1 is wrong.

It does not say the change would serve no purpose, so item 3 is wrong.

So only the cost and coordination reasons are drawn from the passage.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.

Practise on Mcqkart →🎓 Book an expert →