'Humans and animals are both living, breathing beings. Humans have civil rights. Therefore, animals have civil rights.' This indicates which fallacy?

The argument leans on a likeness between humans and animals that cannot carry the weight claimed.

Both being living, breathing beings is a shared but irrelevant feature here.

Civil rights attach to features specific to persons, not to breathing alone.

Inferring shared rights from a superficial resemblance is unsound.

Drawing a conclusion from a weak or irrelevant similarity is false analogy.