Which of the following statements is logically equivalent to the statement 'All tigers are hunting animals'?

ASome hunting animals are tigers

BNo tigers are non-hunting animals ✓ Correct

CNo hunting animals are tigers

DSome hunting animals are not tigers

Correct answer: (B) No tigers are non-hunting animals

Explanation

"No tigers are non-hunting animals" is the equivalent statement.

The base "All tigers are hunting animals" is an A proposition.

Obversion changes the quality and negates the predicate term.

A "All S are P" thus becomes E "No S are non-P".

So it yields "No tigers are non-hunting animals" with the same meaning.

Want more like this? Create a free account to practise a full test, track your progress, and get spaced-repetition review.