"Fire is cold, because it is a substance." This is an instance of which of the hetuabhasas (fallacies of inference)?

The conclusion "fire is cold" is directly refuted by perception, a case of badhita.

The mark offered is that fire is a substance.

But the very property to be proved, coldness, is contradicted by experience.

We plainly perceive fire to be hot, not cold.

When a stronger means of knowledge disproves the sadhya, the mark is contradicted.

A middle whose conclusion is overturned by perception is the fallacy of badhita.